The Problem
Sometimes the problem is clear, but the right solution isn’t:
- Unclear requirements: Stakeholders have goals, but not a shared definition of success
- Hidden constraints: Legacy systems, data quality, or team capacity change what’s feasible
- Too many options: Multiple approaches look viable, but the trade-offs aren’t clear
- Scope creep risk: Without boundaries, projects balloon and timelines slip
- Decision paralysis: Teams delay action because the next step isn’t confident
When a solution isn’t obvious, the fastest path forward is a focused discovery process.
How I Solve It
I run structured discovery to turn ambiguity into a clear, buildable plan:
Problem Framing
- Align stakeholders on goals, success metrics, and non-goals
- Map the current workflow and pinpoint friction and failure points
- Identify real constraints (tech stack, timelines, budget, compliance)
Solution Options
- Evaluate multiple approaches with costs, risks, and trade-offs
- Recommend the smallest viable solution that still solves the problem
- Flag what should be automated, integrated, or rebuilt
Scope and Roadmap
- Define a phased plan with deliverables and milestones
- Highlight dependencies and integration requirements
- Deliver a clear scope that engineering can execute
Need This Solution?
If your problem is clear but the right solution isn't, I can help map the best path forward.
Common Scenarios
- You want automation, but don’t know where to start
- You suspect multiple systems are out of sync, but can’t confirm root causes
- You’re replacing a platform and need to avoid a risky rebuild
- You need a roadmap before committing engineering or budget
The Outcome
You leave with a clear, actionable plan: defined scope, validated priorities, and a solution path that fits your real constraints. If a custom build isn’t required, you’ll know that too before investing in the wrong thing.